subscribesubscriber servicescontact usabout ussite mapBuy a Classified
Fri, Aug 08 2008 

Published May 13, 2008 09:52 pm - In the wake of Greenville’s revised Act 47 plan, council plans to seriously consider if the borough can afford a paid fire department.

Can Greenville afford paid firefighters? Council could put question to voters


By Monica Pryts
Herald Staff Writer

GREENVILLE

In the wake of Greenville’s revised Act 47 plan, council plans to seriously consider if the borough can afford a paid fire department.

Council vice president Pamela Auchter brought the idea to the table at Tuesday’s meeting after discussing her hands-on participation Saturday in a training session with the fire department and Mayor Dick Miller’s call for a referendum on department’s status.

Mrs. Auchter and council member David Henderson suited up and walked through a controlled house fire at Butler County Fire School. She said the experience was well worth it.

New Act 47 recommendations suggest council members determine if the borough can continue to support a paid fire department, one of many hard decisions that needs to be made, Mrs. Auchter said.

Act 47 is the state’s debt recovery plan for financially-distressed communities. The state declared Greenville an Act 47 town in May of 2002.

Miller has suggested council decide if a volunteer fire department would be more feasible. Council could vote to get the measure on the ballot next spring for voters to decide if paid or volunteer is the way to go, he said after the meeting.

Under state law, a vote is required to dissolve a paid department.

If council does choose to put the issue on the ballot, a plan would have to be in place that would outline the workings of an all-volunteer fire department, Miller said.

The fire department currently has six paid full-time firefighters and a chief and seven active volunteers. The firefighters’ union contract has been a point of contention between the union and the borough.

Council President Pete Longiotti on Thursday announced the borough plans to file an appeal with the state Supreme Court for its contract with International Association of Fire Fighters Local 1976.

The borough has argued the manpower section of the contract, which says two firefighters should be on duty at all times and fire department apparatus can’t respond to a fire call with less than two firefighters, violates the Act 47 plan.



print this story    email this story    comment on this story   

Click to discuss this story with other readers on our forums.




monster
wheels
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide

Have a question for The Herald?
You are only one click away

Premier Guide
Premium Jobs

Friday, August 8
*Substitute Positions
* TEACHERS
* NURSES
* SECRETARIES
* BUS DRIVERS
Neshannock Township Schoo
...>MORE

See all ads

Premium Autos

See all ads

Premium Homes

See all ads

Premium Extras

See all ads


   

 

Community Newspaper Holdings, Inc.CNHI Classified Advertising NetworkCNHI News Service
Associated Press content © 2008. All rights reserved. AP content may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Our site is powered by Zope and our Internet Yellow Pages site is powered by PremierGuide.
Some parts of our site may require you to download the Flash Player Plugin.
View our Privacy Policy
Advertiser index

rc