subscribesubscriber servicescontact usabout ussite mapBuy a Classified
Sat, Jul 04 2009 

Resources

print this story   Print this story
  Post to del.icio.us

Published November 15, 2008 05:04 pm - Did Sharon council tentatively pass a 10 percent tax hike for 2009 Thursday night? No one seems to be sure.

Did Sharon council's vote to raise taxes count? Home rule rules sow uncertainty


By Courtney Anderson
Herald Staff Writer

SHARON

Did Sharon council tentatively pass a 10 percent tax hike for 2009 Thursday night?

No one seems to be sure.

According to the home rule charter that took effect this year, any increase in taxes must be approved by a supermajority of council which is four members.

A vote Thursday on an ordinance setting a 4-mill real estate tax increase resulted in 3 members for it and two against.

No one at the meeting announced whether the measure passed or failed after that vote. The Herald reported that it passed.

“I’m surprised nobody mentioned it,” said council member Frank Connelly, who voted against the hike along with Bob Messina.

Council President Victor Heutsche Friday morning said he thought the vote meant council would have to have a special meeting in order to get two readings of the tax ordinance done before council’s Dec. 28 deadline to pass a final budget.

He also said he was unsure if that meant the preliminary budget passed or not because the tax increase is part of the budget.

Later in the day, Lucas said he spoke to city Solicitor William J. Madden, who said that the supermajority vote is only needed for the final adoption of the budget. The Herald was unable to contact Madden on Friday.

Connelly Friday said that the way he read the charter council needed two votes, both with a supermajority, to pass a tax hike.

“I assumed last night when we didn’t get the four votes … that we’d have to change (the ordinance) and vote again,” he said.

Another Sharon lawyer who was involved in drafting the charter and is part of the team working on the transition from the old form of government to the new reads the charter differently.

William McConnell Jr. said he didn’t think two votes on an ordinance is necessary under the charter. The way he interprets the law, a preliminary budget does not need to officially be passed by a council vote, he said.

“Maybe we’re OK then,” Heutsche said Friday afternoon after hearing McConnell’s take on the issue.

“I’m a little confused there,” Connelly said, after hearing the different takes on the law.



print this story    email this story   




Zillow
monster
autoconx
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide

Have a question
for The Herald?
You are only a click away


Premier Guide
Premium Jobs

See all ads

Premium Autos

See all ads

Premium Homes

See all ads

Premium Extras

See all ads


   

 

Community Newspaper Holdings, Inc.CNHI Classified Advertising NetworkCNHI News Service
Associated Press content © 2009. All rights reserved. AP content may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Our site is powered by Zope and our Internet Yellow Pages site is powered by PremierGuide.
Some parts of our site may require you to download the Flash Player Plugin.
View our Privacy Policy
Advertiser index