June 29, 2009 09:37 pm
—
Dean Dairy supports our community
Lori Weston, Mercer
I just read the article about Brookfield schools awarding their milk contract to Turner instead of Dean’s. To put it mildly I am appalled.
Dean Dairy is not just a local dairy, they are an invaluable asset to our community. They are involved in our community.
Who always donates for a good cause? Just ask any non-profit organization or school group and they will tell you it is Dean Dairy. Who always places ads and buys tickets for a charitable banquet? Again, Dean Dairy.
As for quality of milk, Dean’s has the highest of standards and they certainly meet those standards. What a low blow to accuse them of inferior milk.
Let’s look beyond the moment and focus on the future of our community. I believe that it is imperative that we support our local businesses. After all, do we need to have more layoffs or plant closings?
Retailers should not bear cost of recycling bins
Frank E. Little, Hermitage
The recent letter making a mindless attack on Walmart was appallingly thoughtless. Since when is a private business responsible for hosting public recycling bins on its property and to assign a paid employee to police the behavior of “degenerates” that abuse the recycling bins?
Instead of criticism, Walmart should be thanked for service to the community for hosting those bins all those years for free. Walmart got tired of garbage dumped there, how many “local” businesses stepped up to offer some community service? Exactly none. Where was local government, who would seem to be the proper authority for policing illegal dumping. No arrest authority has been given to Walmart. Heck, they don’t even sell guns anymore at Greenville. But I saw no criticism whatsoever of the failure of Greenville for its own trash problem.
So where were all those who extol the virtues of local businesses and demonize Walmart as a global destroyer? Even the proposed silly solution of loading this community responsibility onto Walmart came late, after the move of the bins had already been made and the costs incurred. So what was the real objective of the letter? It just seems like sour grapes against Walmart.
Not that Walmart is perfect, it isn’t. But, what is the rationale for loading this burden on Walmart, as opposed to Tractor Supply or Peebles or Giant Eagle or Rite-Aid, etc.? Perhaps even one of the mythical “mom and pop” businesses could be assigned trash duty? It seems like Greenville has adopted a welfare mentality under Act 47 that they are “owed” help from everybody else. No free lunches anymore. It’s time to take responsibility, tax adequately and take out your own trash.
Copyright © 1999-2008 cnhi, inc.